Skip to Content
Top

The Implications of the Habitual Violent Offender Classification

|

Understanding criminal classifications is crucial in the legal system as they significantly affect sentencing outcomes and the overall handling of a case. Classifications such as "habitual violent offender" can lead to more severe penalties, making it essential for defendants and their families to comprehend these terms and their implications fully. The ability to challenge these designations is vital for those seeking to avoid stringent penalties that could impact their lives for years.

In Utah, the designation of a habitual violent offender is particularly significant as it can dramatically increase the prison term if an individual is convicted of the current offense. This classification comes into play when an individual has a history of violent crime.

However, this designation is not automatic and can be contested in court. A skilled defense lawyer is crucial in challenging the allegations that may lead to this severe classification. By presenting a solid defense against charges for a violent felony or by questioning the validity of past convictions used to justify the habitual status, a lawyer can influence the trajectory of a case.

If you’re facing felony charges in Salt Lake City, call Lokken & Putnam, P.C. at (801) 829-9783 or contact us online to schedule a consultation about your case.

What Is the Habitual Violent Offender Classification?

The habitual violent offender classification is a legal designation used to identify individuals who have demonstrated a pattern of violent behavior through multiple felony offenses. According to Utah Code § 76-3-203.5(b), a person is classified as a habitual violent offender if they have been convicted of multiple violent felonies and have been imprisoned in any state or federal correctional institution.

The criteria for this classification are specific:

  • Current charge of a violent felony. Felonies are crimes where the maximum sentence is more than one year in prison. Utah Code § 76-3-203.5(c) lists several offenses defined as violent, which include:
    • Arson
    • Criminal mischief
    • Aggravated assault
    • Mayhem
    • Stalking
    • Kidnaping
    • Burglary
  • Previous convictions. The defendant must have two or more prior convictions for violent felonies.
  • Incarceration. There must be a record of the defendant being committed to a state or federal prison. This confinement could have occurred immediately at the time of sentencing or might have been imposed after a probation revocation.

How Is the Habitual Violent Offender Designation Assigned?

The process of assigning a defendant as a habitual violent offender begins with the prosecuting attorney. They determine whether a defendant should receive the designation based on a review of the individual’s criminal history to identify any patterns of violent felony convictions.

If the prosecuting attorney concludes that the habitual violent offender status might be applicable, they will formally notify the court and the defense. This notification is typically included in the indictment or information, making it a formal part of the court proceedings. This step is crucial as it informs the defense of the potential enhanced penalties and allows them to prepare an appropriate response.

The ultimate decision on whether the defendant is classified as a habitual violent offender is made by the trier of fact—this can be a judge or a jury, depending on the case. This decision must be based on evidence presented during the trial, and the designation must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

What Are the Implications of Being Classified as a Habitual Violent Offender?

Being classified as a habitual violent offender carries significant legal ramifications that can alter the course of sentencing for a convicted individual.

The most direct impact of the designation is the enhancement of penalties for the underlying crime:

  • Third-degree felony enhanced to first-degree felony. Normally, a third-degree felony carries a potential prison term of up to five years. However, if the defendant is a habitual offender, the penalty is escalated to that of a first-degree felony, which can be up to life imprisonment.
  • Second-degree felony enhanced to first-degree felony. For a second-degree felony, the typical sentencing range of one to 15 years can also be increased to a first-degree felony level, significantly extending the potential maximum sentence.
  • First-degree felony penalties intensified. While the classification does not change the degree of a first-degree felony, it eliminates the possibility of probation. It is considered an aggravating factor when determining the length of incarceration. Thus, the sentence could be at the higher end of the allowable range, potentially resulting in life imprisonment without parole.

Can a Defendant Challenge the Habitual Violent Offender Classification?

Navigating the complexities of a criminal defense where the designation of habitual violent offender looms can influence the case. Understanding and implementing effective legal strategies is essential for defending against such severe classifications.

One fundamental strategy is contesting the validity of previous convictions when determining whether the designation applies. The defendant can argue that there has been a mistaken identity, asserting that they were not the person who committed or was convicted of the prior violent felonies. Another approach is to challenge the voluntariness of previous plea entries. The defendant may argue that their prior pleas (which led to convictions counted toward the habitual status) were not entered voluntarily, perhaps due to inadequate legal representation or not fully understanding the consequences of the plea.

If the defendant denies the habitual violent offender designation, crucial information about their previous violent felony convictions or the allegations of being a habitual offender is withheld from the jury until after it returns its initial verdict. Should the jury return a guilty verdict on the underlying charge, a separate trial phase is conducted to determine whether the defendant should indeed be classified as a habitual violent offender.

How Can a Defense Lawyer Help?

A criminal defense lawyer is essential in cases where a risk exists of being classified as a habitual violent offender. These legal professionals have a deep understanding of the criminal justice system. They are skilled in challenging the prosecution's attempts to enhance sentencing based on past convictions.

Defense attorneys can scrutinize prior convictions to identify potential errors or grounds for contesting their validity, such as challenging the evidence used or the circumstances under which a plea was entered. A lawyer may also negotiate with prosecutors to reduce charges before they escalate to a potential habitual violent offender classification, impacting the case's direction.

At Lokken & Putnam, P.C., we have the insights to navigate complex legal proceedings effectively. Make an appointment to meet with one of our Salt Lake City attorneys by calling (801) 829-9783 or sending an online message.

Categories: